Context
On this week of my FMP, the main focus was recording and editing the second episode of my project titling it, “Repackaging the past”
This episode was a direct build from episode one, which setup the foundation as to what was the main subject of the documentary series. I wanted EP2 to look from more of an anlylitcal point of view being much more aggressive in its style, feeling like more of an accusation rather than a calm vibe EP1 was aiming for.
The aim was to challenege the listener’s perception, showing that nostalgia is not just a feeling but it can be some thing that is deliberatley constructed, edited and used. I ensuured for the episode that it remained accessible and engaging for the primariy audience of 16-24 year olds, while maintaining the depth for the secondary audience of 25-36.
Research
Story
I did not want to simply explain what nostalgia was, episode 2’s aim was to focus on how the past can be repackaged and presented back to audiences. The structure of the script was designed to guide the listener through the idea step by step, allowing them to take in the thoughts and ideas I was attempting to represent.
The episode still connects back to my core research into memory, media and nostalgia but applies it in a more critical and thought provoking way, helping to develop the overal direction.
This also entails within the script which can be found here. And the script was designed to be shorter and more hard hitting with more impactfull wors that allowed to sink into the audience.
This is all coupled with me experimenting with more of a narritive structure in comparison to episode one, introducing moments that directly distrupt the listener’s expectations.
Stylistic
Stylistically, this episode is in a direct contradiction to episode one while it still manages to remain as a step up and a build from the foundations that episode one layed out
The first episode focused on warmth and reflection, episode 2 introduces a more unstelling and controlled tone. I used sound design to manipulate the listenr’s ecxpectations, including moments where the audio creates a false sense of comfort before being interuptted.
An example of this is shown below
I introduced a jazz style track at the beginning to create a calm, familliar atmosphere before cutting it and replacing it with glitch effects, to act as iot something was wrong with the vhs tape that was put in, a rewind effect then comes in with the idea of “attempting to fix” the problem but now the truth was going to revealed in the broken tape.
As the episode progresses the tone becomes darker, with pulsing sounds and more unsettling audio designed to feel like an accusation as iof the listneer was being cornered. This then shifts into reputting a different VHS which does work “properly” at the end which fits for a familliar, nostalgic ending.
Technical
The technical focus was to aim for vocal clarity and complex sound layering
All annoted screenshots are shown below
The narration was recorded in a treated environment and edited using Adobe Audition on my MacBook Pro M2. I used the same vocal processing chain as Episode 1 to maintain consistency across the series. This included:
- DeNoise
- De-Esser
- Parametric EQ
- Dynamics Processing
- Multiband Compressor
- Hard Limiter
Practical Skills
I completed the full scripting, recording and editing of Episode 2, while also developing more advanced sound design techniques.
A key skill I developed was manipulating the listener’s expectations through audio. This included:
- Creating a false sense of security using music before disrupting it
- Repeating and glitching dialogue to simulate audio corruption
- Cutting audio abruptly to create tension
- Using silence and empty space strategically to emphasise key moments
I also continued using bricking and stepping methods within the multitrack to organise the session and layer multiple sound effects effectively. This was particularly important due to the increased complexity of this episode compared to Episode 1.
Volume automation and fades were used more precisely to control how sounds entered and exited, ensuring that the narration remained the focus while still allowing the sound design to have impact.
Evaluation and Reflection
What Went Well (WWW)
1. The episode successfully developed the project’s narrative.
Episode 2 clearly builds on Episode 1 by shifting from emotional reflection to critical analysis. This progression makes the overall documentary feel more structured and purposeful.
2. The sound design became more creative and impactful.
The use of glitches, repetition and abrupt transitions helped create a more immersive and thought-provoking listening experience. It also reinforced the core theme of manipulation within nostalgia.
3. The editing structure was well organised despite increased complexity.
Using markers, bricking and stepping methods helped manage a much more detailed multitrack session, making the workflow more controlled and efficient.
Even Better If (EBI)
1. Some transitions could be refined further.
While the disruptive style worked well, a few transitions could be smoothed slightly to maintain clarity without losing impact.
2. The balance between narration and effects could be improved in places.
At certain points, sound effects compete slightly with the vocal. Further fine-tuning would ensure the narration always remains dominant.
3. Planning sound design earlier could improve efficiency.
Although experimentation led to strong creative outcomes, pre-planning certain sound design sections could reduce editing time while maintaining quality.
A link to this episode will be attached when the series is complete
















